On Palm Sunday, Russian armed forces launched a missile strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy, targeting the central district during one of the most densely attended periods of the day.
The attack has left dozens dead and wounded, with local authorities warning that the number of casualties is expected to rise as search and rescue operations continue.
Preliminary reports indicate that the missile strike deliberately struck residential neighbourhoods. The attack took place in the city centre at a time when civilians had gathered for religious observances and family activities. No military installations have been reported near the impact site.
Ukrainian officials have described the strike as a continuation of Russia’s pattern of targeting civilian infrastructure in urban areas. In a previous incident in Kryvyi Rih, the Russian Ministry of Defence claimed it had targeted a restaurant allegedly frequented by military personnel. However, no evidence of military presence or activity was found at the site. The restaurant itself remained largely undamaged, and Russian authorities did not provide additional verification for their claims.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of no longer attempting to conceal the civilian nature of its targets. According to his statement, such actions are intended to instil fear in the population and exert pressure on Kyiv to capitulate. He argued that missile attacks are being used strategically to break the resolve of Ukraine’s population by emphasising the perceived ineffectiveness of conventional military defence against long-range attacks.
Analysts suggest that these strikes serve multiple objectives. Firstly, they aim to pressure Ukrainian leadership by creating a constant state of insecurity and uncertainty among civilians. Secondly, they are designed to polarise Ukrainian society—pitting those who advocate for continued resistance against those who may begin to support any resolution that brings an end to missile strikes, regardless of the political cost.
Zelensky further addressed the ongoing diplomatic engagement between Moscow and Washington, warning that Russia interprets the continuation of such talks as a green light to intensify military action without facing substantial repercussions. He characterised the Kremlin’s strategy as one that follows a clear internal logic—one grounded in coercion and the projection of dominance over territories it deems as strategically valuable.
Ukrainian President referenced historical examples and literary accounts of similar tactics used in other conflicts, including the forced displacement and execution of civilians in post-blockade territories. Drawing a parallel, he suggested that the Kremlin’s end goal is to depopulate Ukrainian areas deemed disloyal, replacing residents with populations more aligned with Moscow’s interests.
Zelenskyy also criticised narratives that seek to blur the distinction between Ukrainian and Russian identities. He pointed to statements made by Russian opposition figures before Western audiences, arguing that claims of shared history and language are used to justify ongoing aggression rather than promote reconciliation. He cited longstanding patterns of suppression of Ukrainian national identity throughout various historical periods as evidence of a deep-rooted antagonism that continues to inform Russian policy.
In terms of military objectives, Zelenskyy suggested that the targeting of Sumy may indicate preparatory actions for future territorial incursions. The Sumy region, bordering Russia, has long been considered a strategic location. He posited that the attack may be an attempt to create conditions suitable for a further Russian advance or, alternatively, to establish a buffer zone that would facilitate the segmentation of Ukrainian territory along proposed lines of control.
According to this perspective, such segmentation would serve future negotiations by creating new facts on the ground. Zelenskyy warned that any such proposals, presented during ongoing diplomatic talks, could be framed by Russia as necessary steps toward a “quick peace”, while in reality serving broader strategic aims.
The latest strike on Sumy underscores the ongoing vulnerability of Ukrainian cities to missile attacks. Despite continued Western support for Ukrainian defensive operations, long-range strikes remain difficult to intercept, especially when directed at civilian areas. The Ukrainian government has repeatedly called for enhanced air defence capabilities to mitigate the impact of such attacks.
At the time of writing, emergency services in Sumy are continuing recovery efforts. Local officials are working to verify the final number of casualties and assess the structural damage to the city’s residential infrastructure.
The international response remains muted, with Western capitals focusing on broader strategic considerations in their dialogue with Moscow. However, the incident in Sumy is likely to reignite calls for a reassessment of the humanitarian and military dimensions of the ongoing war.
Read also:
Trump Criticises Russia’s Bombing of Ukraine but Offers No New Measures
