New arms trade decree and innovation strategy aim to bolster industry, streamline regulation and deepen NATO cooperation.
In a move designed to position itself as an agile and competitive partner in Europe’s evolving defence architecture, the Flemish government has approved a far-reaching reform of its arms trade regulations alongside a new industrial strategy for security and defence.
Announced late last week by Minister-President Matthias Diependaele, the measures reflect both a pragmatic response to geopolitical pressures and a bold attempt to grow Flanders’ footprint in the high-tech defence sector.
At the heart of the package is a draft arms trade decree intended to modernise a legal framework that officials and defence industry stakeholders have long criticised as outdated and overly cumbersome.
The previous legislation, last revised in 2017, was widely seen as overly complex and, in places, more restrictive than necessary under European Union rules — a practice often described by Brussels officials as “gold plating”. The new decree aims to streamline procedures, shorten processing times and give Flemish companies greater ease in supplying military goods, components and even civilian firearms across the EU and to trusted partners such as NATO allies.
For industry executives and policymakers alike, the reforms signal a welcome recalibration. By simplifying administrative requirements and aligning more closely with EU norms, the Flemish government hopes to eliminate bottlenecks that previously inhibited exports and cooperation. Under the new framework, companies will find it easier to participate in cross-border defence projects and meet the growing demand for innovative technologies from allied nations — a sector where Flanders already enjoys strengths in areas such as aerospace, space systems and artificial intelligence.
Crucially, the government has been at pains to insist that the reforms do not mean a weakening of safeguards. The long-standing ban on weapons exports to Israel remains in force, while full permit procedures and rigorous end-use inspections will continue to apply to so-called high-risk destinations — those countries subject to sanctions or embroiled in active conflict. These stipulations are designed to ensure that Belgium’s regulatory regime continues to respect both international law and the broader ethical norms that have underpinned European arms control policy for decades.
Alongside the arms trade decree, the Flemish authorities have unveiled the Flemish Innovation and Industrial Strategy for Security and Defence (VISD), a long-term blueprint that seeks to cultivate industrial ecosystems around key technological clusters. Enshrined within the wider defence plan presented earlier this year, the VISD envisages annual funding that starts at €5 million but rises to €50 million by 2029, aimed at catalysing research and development, fostering knowledge sharing and encouraging collaboration between firms, academic institutions and government bodies.
“The intention is to allow cutting-edge Flemish technology to grow from pilot projects into effective solutions ready for our own defence, and for broader European and NATO cooperation,” Mr Diependaele said in a statement outlining the government’s ambitions. By investing in innovation today, he argued, Flanders not only strengthens its own industrial base but also contributes to a more resilient and capable Western defence posture at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.
Observers note that the reform comes against a backdrop of broader shifts in European defence policy. Member states have been under mounting pressure to modernise their armed forces and defence industries in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, rising tensions across NATO’s eastern flank, and rapid advances in military technologies such as drones, cyber systems and autonomous platforms.
In Belgium, federal authorities have also been moving in step: earlier this year, the national government endorsed a multi-year defence programming bill to guide investment in capabilities through to 2034, part of a concerted effort to enhance the country’s contribution to collective security.
Yet the changes are not without their skeptics. Critics argue that loosening export rules, even within the EU, risks normalising arms flows at a time when regional conflicts and questions about responsible end-use are increasingly sensitive. Civil society groups, for example, have raised concerns about how dual-use technologies and firearms might be diverted or misused, pointing to recent law enforcement operations that uncovered illegal trafficking networks within Belgium.
Defence analysts, too, observe that while streamlining regulations can foster competitiveness, it must be balanced with robust oversight. The challenge for policymakers will be to ensure that industry growth does not come at the expense of transparency and ethical responsibility — a delicate equilibrium in an industry where the commercial and strategic often intersect.
Yet for proponents of the reforms, the potential benefits are clear. Streamlined administration, enhanced industrial capability and deeper integration into European and transatlantic defence markets could yield economic dividends as well as strategic ones. Flanders has long boasted a cluster of innovative firms in sectors from aerospace to information technology. By better harnessing these assets within a coherent policy framework, the region stands to shape its own destiny in a field that is increasingly central to national and collective security.
As the draft decree now moves towards final approval and implementation, all eyes will be on how the new regime performs in practice. Will it unlock fresh opportunities for Flemish exporters and innovators? Or will it raise fresh debates about the role of regional governments in the governance of arms flows and defence cooperation? In the coming years, the answers will matter not just for Flanders, but for the wider tapestry of European defence in an age of strategic competition.
Will NATO shoot down Russian aircraft violating its airspace? Rutte sets out the parameters
Main Image: By Defensie Nederlands – https://magazines.defensie.nl/materieelgezien/2024/03/materieel-mondiaal, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=169660346
