Spy Scandal in Kyiv Deepens Tensions Between Ukraine and China Amid Broader Western Concerns

A recent espionage incident involving Chinese nationals detained in Kyiv has reignited scrutiny over China’s intelligence activities in Ukraine and its broader geopolitical ambitions.

On 9 July 2025, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) apprehended two Chinese citizens allegedly attempting to smuggle classified documentation concerning the production of the Ukrainian-made Neptune cruise missile—an indigenously developed weapon which has played a notable role in Ukraine’s naval defence strategy.

The Ukrainian authorities have not released the names of the detained individuals, but the materials involved reportedly relate to technical and manufacturing specifications of the Neptune missile system. China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded promptly, stating it is examining the situation and would “protect the lawful rights and interests” of its citizens, if necessary.

While not unprecedented, this latest case marks a significant escalation. Ukrainian officials and security analysts argue that China’s interest in Ukraine’s defence technology is not incidental. According to Artur Kharetonov, head of Ukraine’s Liberal-Democratic League, such attempts have recurred over the three decades since Ukraine regained independence. He claims Chinese actors often target those Ukrainian defence developments which have demonstrated efficacy in live combat.

Kharetonov contends that China’s strategic imperative is to acquire dual-use or military-grade technology through covert means when conventional access is denied. In particular, he notes that Beijing’s security apparatus obliges its citizens to cooperate with Chinese intelligence services under national law, complicating Ukraine’s posture towards Chinese nationals residing in the country, especially students and business operatives.

The Neptune missile, developed by Ukraine’s Luch Design Bureau, gained international attention following reported successful deployments in the Black Sea theatre. Its proprietary guidance systems and adaptability have made it a target for foreign intelligence services, according to Ukrainian officials.

Meanwhile, reports from Intelligence Online, a France-based publication specialising in security affairs, suggest that several Chinese technology firms—among them Huawei—are under investigation in Ukraine for alleged involvement in illegal transfers of sensitive drone and missile-related technology. One such company reportedly took part in a Chinese business forum in Kyiv just weeks before the scandal emerged.

This incident comes amid growing tensions between China and the broader Western bloc over Beijing’s alignment with Russia during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently stated that China’s support for Russia is “unacceptable” and warned that such alignment would be a defining factor in the EU’s relations with China moving forward. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in turn, rejected her comments, urging the EU to resolve differences through dialogue while simultaneously criticising what it termed “unjustified accusations”.

European capitals have recorded several other recent incidents involving Chinese intelligence operations. In Greece, four individuals of Chinese nationality were reportedly involved in photographing military infrastructure. In Germany, a laser incident involving a Chinese naval vessel and a German reconnaissance aircraft in the Red Sea has triggered a formal diplomatic protest. There have also been reported cyber intrusions targeting Czech institutions and alleged Chinese plots against Taiwanese officials in Europe.

From the Ukrainian perspective, these developments raise questions about China’s longer-term strategic goals. Kyiv-based analysts argue that Beijing benefits from prolonging the conflict, as a distracted and weakened West presents fewer obstacles to China’s regional ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. This assessment is reinforced by remarks made earlier this month by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who stated that Beijing does not want to see Russia defeated in Ukraine, suggesting that such an outcome might shift American attention more squarely towards containing China.

Observers note that Russia is increasingly reliant on Chinese technology. Components used in Iranian-made Shahed drones, widely deployed by Russian forces, are reportedly manufactured in China. Moreover, launch mechanisms for these drones are said to contain Chinese parts, according to Ukrainian defence sources.

The implications for European security policy are substantial. The EU has already begun to adjust supply chains and investment strategies to reduce dependence on Chinese goods. Multinational corporations such as Apple and Nike have started relocating production to India, Vietnam and elsewhere in Southeast Asia. The Biden and Trump administrations—despite stark differences in many areas—have both pressed for economic decoupling from China and imposed escalating tariffs. Trump’s return to the White House has further sharpened this agenda, with suggestions that states reluctant to sever links with China could face punitive trade measures from Washington.

The longer-term question remains whether incidents such as the one in Kyiv mark isolated intelligence operations or reflect a systematic strategy on China’s part to extract military knowledge from Ukraine. Either way, the episode adds another layer to the shifting global order, where China’s actions are increasingly viewed through the prism of great power competition rather than commercial opportunity.

Read also:

China Sees Ukraine War as Strategic Buffer Against U.S. Pressure, Reported Remarks by Wang Yi Suggest