The perception of a stable Russian economy, promoted by President Vladimir Putin and his officials, has increasingly come under scrutiny.
According to a recent analysis by CNN, the Kremlin’s narrative of economic resilience against Western sanctions imposed after its invasion of Ukraine masks deeper structural issues. Beneath the surface lies an economy strained by war expenditures, labour shortages, and the long-term impact of international isolation.
Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has presented an image of economic resilience, claiming to weather Western sanctions and sustain a wartime economy.
President Vladimir Putin touts the country’s economic growth and record-low unemployment as proof of stability, but closer scrutiny reveals significant cracks. Analysts suggest this façade of strength masks deep structural problems that could jeopardise Russia’s long-term economic viability.
Projecting Strength Amid Sanctions
Putin has consistently lauded Russia’s economic performance, highlighting GDP growth in 2024 that outpaced the United States and major European economies. Official unemployment figures sit at a historic low of 2.3%, and wages have risen, albeit unevenly. These indicators aim to reassure Russian citizens and signal to Ukraine’s allies that Moscow can sustain its war effort indefinitely.
However, economic analysts describe these figures as a mirage. Russia’s “shadow budget,” a concealed funding mechanism for war-related expenses, distorts the true cost of its military operations. Reports suggest that since the war began, up to 60% of a 71% surge in private credit—amounting to $249 billion—has been directed to war-related industries. These loans, coerced by the state under emergency legislation, create a debt bubble that risks destabilising Russia’s banking sector.
Despite Putin’s assurances, inflation surged to 9.5% in 2024, its highest level in years. Rising prices, combined with a labour shortage driven by war casualties, are straining the Russian economy.
Ukraine estimates Russia has sustained more than 800,000 casualties since 2022, including 150,000 killed in 2024 alone. Although Russia disputes these figures, the depletion of its workforce is evident and acknowledged even by Russian economists.
Energy Sector Struggles
Western sanctions targeting Russia’s energy exports have further undermined its economic position. In late 2024, the Biden administration implemented measures against Russia’s “shadow fleet,” a group of ageing tankers used to circumvent earlier sanctions. Unable to dock at ports in India and China, these ships have disrupted oil flows, prompting both countries to seek alternative suppliers.
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s refusal to renew a transit agreement for Russian gas has cost Gazprom billions. Once a pillar of Russia’s economy, the state-controlled energy giant posted its first loss in nearly 25 years in 2023. Gazprom’s financial woes reduce its ability to contribute to Russia’s war chest, a worrying sign for the Kremlin as energy revenue remains a critical source of funding.
A Fragile Social Contract
The economic strain is beginning to erode the Kremlin’s social contract, which trades political acquiescence for economic stability. As war spending consumes a growing share of the budget, funding for domestic programmes has dwindled.
Increased wages, intended to address labour shortages, have not alleviated the strain on Russian households. Inflation and rising living costs have led to rumours of potential freezes on bank deposits, further unsettling savers. Although the central bank dismissed these rumours as “absurd,” their mere existence signals declining confidence among ordinary Russians.
Strategic Implications
Russia’s economic challenges extend beyond its borders, with geopolitical ramifications that could influence the war in Ukraine. Sanctions targeting Russia’s economy have demonstrated their effectiveness, slowing oil and gas exports and tightening financial constraints. Analysts believe these pressures could force Moscow to the negotiating table, particularly if sanctions relief is offered as a bargaining chip.
Nevertheless, Putin has shown a willingness to sacrifice economic stability for geopolitical gains. His strategy, described as “reflexive control,” seeks to manipulate perceptions in the West, convincing Ukraine’s allies that Russia can endure indefinitely. By projecting strength, Putin aims to deter further Western support for Ukraine, potentially slowing the supply of advanced weaponry to Kyiv.
The Mirage of Growth
Despite headline growth figures, the Russian economy is increasingly reliant on unsustainable practices. Experts compare Russia’s wartime economy to an athlete on steroids: superficially strong but ultimately fragile. The surge in private credit, driven by state-mandated loans to unprofitable war-related firms, risks triggering a banking crisis. This wave of “toxic debt” could overwhelm financial institutions, compounding the Kremlin’s economic challenges.
Even if Russia avoids a financial collapse, the long-term outlook remains bleak. The International Monetary Fund forecasts GDP growth of just 1.4% in 2025, down from 3.8% in 2024. With inflation outpacing wage growth and sanctions constraining key industries, the Kremlin faces mounting pressure to balance its war effort with domestic stability.
The Clock is Ticking on Russia’s Economic Illusion
Russia’s economy is straining under the weight of war, sanctions, and systemic inefficiencies. Despite the Kremlin’s claims of resilience, mounting evidence points to vulnerabilities that could undermine its ability to sustain the conflict in Ukraine.
For Ukraine and its partners, the situation presents both a window of opportunity and a strategic challenge. Sanctions are proving effective, but their impact hinges on consistent enforcement and the ability to adapt measures as Russia shifts tactics. The West must also anticipate and counter Moscow’s efforts to manipulate perceptions and sow discord among its adversaries.
The reality is clear: Russia’s economic foundations are increasingly unstable. The critical question is not if this instability will erode its wartime capacity, but how much longer the Kremlin can mask the cracks before its position becomes untenable.
Read also:
Biden Highlights Ukraine’s Path to Victory Amid New Sanctions