President Vladimir Putin has described recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as an “absolutely unprovoked act of aggression”, a claim that has prompted widespread criticism given Russia’s own ongoing war against Ukraine.
Speaking in Moscow during a meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Putin said the attacks had “no basis and no justification”, and insisted that Russia was “working to assist the Iranian people”.
The timing of the statement was not lost on observers. Just hours before Putin’s meeting, Russian forces launched yet another wave of drone and missile strikes against Ukraine, killing at least eight people in Kyiv and the surrounding region. As has become routine, the targets were civilian areas.
Russia’s war in Ukraine – now well into its twelfth year – began with the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and escalated into a full-scale invasion in February 2022. Since then, the Kremlin has prosecuted a campaign of attritional warfare marked by systematic strikes on urban centres, energy infrastructure, and frontline communities. The use of Iranian-made Shahed drones has become a signature feature of Russia’s long-range attacks.
In this context, Putin’s condemnation of the Iran strikes has been widely dismissed as cynical and hypocritical. Ukrainian officials were quick to point out the irony of the Kremlin invoking international law and sovereignty, even as Russian forces continue to occupy and bombard large swathes of Ukrainian territory.
The Russian president’s remarks were part of a wider display of strategic alignment with Iran. Araghchi, for his part, denounced the United States and Israel, declaring their actions against Iran to be illegitimate. The meeting offered a reminder that both Moscow and Tehran are increasingly united in their opposition to Western influence, and in their efforts to forge alternative security arrangements outside the US-led international order.
Yet for all its rhetorical flourishes, the Kremlin’s position is undermined by its own record. Putin has long presented Russia as a bulwark against Western aggression, but the invasion of Ukraine – unprovoked and launched without credible legal pretext – has left Moscow’s credibility in tatters across much of Europe and the democratic world.
Putin’s efforts to reframe the international narrative – casting Russia as a responsible actor and others as reckless aggressors – follow a familiar pattern. It is the same strategy employed to justify the annexation of Crimea, the intervention in Syria, and repeated interference in Western political systems. In each case, the Kremlin has sought to invert reality and portray its own actions as defensive responses to supposed external threats.
The war in Ukraine, however, continues to lay bare the hollowness of that posture. In recent months, Russian forces have intensified attacks on frontline cities such as Kharkiv, and have targeted infrastructure critical to civilian life. Border regions near occupied areas are struck almost daily. The Russian military’s continued reliance on Iranian drones – including the Shahed-136 – has also cemented its operational dependence on Tehran.
By condemning the strikes on Iran as “unprovoked aggression”, Putin appears to be setting the stage for a broader diplomatic campaign. The aim is likely to discredit the West in the eyes of other authoritarian regimes and fence-sitting countries, and to cast Russia as a leader of a multipolar order. But such positioning carries little weight with governments familiar with the Kremlin’s own conduct.
Putin’s criticism of the West over Iran rings particularly hollow when considered against the backdrop of his own actions. While he lectures others on the principles of sovereignty and restraint, Russian forces continue to kill civilians and flatten towns. The deaths of eight people in Kyiv on the same day as his statement are just the latest in a litany of attacks that have brought devastation to Ukrainian lives.
As ever, the Kremlin appears more interested in shaping headlines than in adhering to any consistent principles. The contradiction at the heart of Putin’s foreign policy is not merely rhetorical – it is structural. Russia claims to uphold international norms even as it systematically violates them.
For Ukrainians, and for many beyond, Moscow’s protestations of innocence will do little to obscure the daily reality of war. As long as Russia continues to wage its campaign against Ukraine, claims of “unprovoked aggression” elsewhere will only serve to highlight the duplicity of a regime increasingly isolated from the international mainstream.
Read also:
Now Khamenei Must Go: Iran’s People Cry Out for Peace and Freedom
