In a pivotal development, U.S. President Joe Biden announced the agreement of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, potentially ending a 467-day conflict in the Gaza Strip. This agreement marks a significant milestone in the final days of Biden’s presidency and a critical moment as Donald Trump prepares to assume office.
The ceasefire agreement, though not yet fully ratified, represents a major diplomatic breakthrough. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is expected to approve the deal in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, signalling cautious optimism for peace. The truce will proceed in multiple stages, each with complex implications.
Key Provisions of the Agreement
The first stage of the deal centres on the release of hostages and prisoners. Hamas has agreed to release 33 Israeli hostages, prioritising women, children, and men over 50. In return, Israel will release Palestinian prisoners on a proportional basis: 30 Palestinian detainees for each civilian hostage and 50 for each female soldier. The initial stage also includes the release of all Palestinian women and children detained since the Hamas raid on Israel in October 2023.
The exchange is expected to take place over six weeks, with weekly releases of hostages and prisoners. The total number of Palestinian detainees released in this phase could range from 990 to 1,650, depending on the progress of the hostage releases. Following this, Hamas is required to return the bodies of deceased hostages.
The agreement stipulates that the United States, Egypt, and Qatar will act as guarantors to ensure compliance. Negotiations for a second stage, focusing on the release of remaining hostages, a complete ceasefire, and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, are scheduled to begin 16 days after the first phase.
The final stage envisions the reconstruction of Gaza under the supervision of Egypt, Qatar, and the United Nations. However, this long-term vision raises critical questions about governance and security in Gaza.
Implications and Concerns
While the humanitarian aspect of the agreement is evident, particularly in the release of hostages who have endured significant trauma, the deal raises substantial security and strategic concerns for Israel. Critics argue that the exchange of Palestinian prisoners, including individuals convicted of involvement in terrorist activities, may bolster Hamas’s ranks and leadership.
The release of nearly 1,650 Palestinian detainees could restore the operational capacity of Hamas, whose leadership and infrastructure were significantly weakened during the conflict. This concern is underscored by the history of figures such as Yahya Sinwar, a former prisoner who played a key role in orchestrating the 2023 attack on Israel.
Another contentious point is the absence of a clear governance plan for Gaza following the withdrawal of Israeli forces. Without a stable administrative framework, Gaza may remain vulnerable to further conflict and exploitation by extremist groups. Hamas’s propaganda framing the agreement as a victory could further entrench its influence among Gaza’s population.
Political and Regional Dynamics
The timing of the agreement has significant political ramifications. Observers note that both sides may have sought to finalise a deal before Donald Trump takes office. For Hamas, presenting itself as a constructive participant in negotiations could deter harsher measures under a Trump administration. For Netanyahu, aligning with Biden’s ceasefire proposal may have been a strategic move to avoid friction with the incoming U.S. administration.
The agreement also serves as a reminder of the challenges in achieving lasting peace in the region. Israel’s security remains precarious, with no definitive resolution to the root causes of the conflict. The ceasefire, while a step towards de-escalation, is unlikely to provide long-term stability without comprehensive measures to address the political, social, and economic issues underpinning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Broader Implications
The deal may also hold lessons for other conflict zones, including the ongoing war in Ukraine. The balance between preserving national security and negotiating under external pressure reflects a dilemma faced by governments in protracted conflicts. As the Biden administration transitions, the ceasefire underscores the delicate interplay of domestic and international politics in shaping peace efforts.
While the immediate focus will be on the humanitarian outcomes, such as the reunion of families with their loved ones, the broader implications for regional stability and global security remain uncertain. The deal’s success will depend not only on its implementation but also on the willingness of all parties to pursue a sustainable resolution.
Read also:
IDF and Shin Bet Eliminate October 7th Attack Leader in Gaza Operation
